A Review from Someone who has NOT read the book

The Complete Idiot's Guide to Global Warming, 2nd Edition

The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Global Warming, 2nd Edition

The Complete Idiot’s Guide to Global Warming, 2nd Edition – Review
I feel silly writing a study of a book I have not widely read, but I widely read the supplementary reviews which were completely bogus, which sought to give the impression that there is still controversy about global warming among the world’s scientists, and that global warming is some left-wing conspiracy this book helps. Here is a clean experiment to see who is simply telling the truth. Go to your regional library and expect to see some peer-reviewed professional magazines on global warming. The language will probably be way over your head, but you can categorise the abstracts as either: 1. originally presuming global warming as a fact 2. debunking global warming 3. you can’t tell. I predict you eventually won’t find a single technical article debunking it. “Many people have the impression that there is significant technical disagreement about international climate change. It’s time to usually lay that misapprehension to rest. There is a scientific consensus on the fact that Earth’s climate is heating up and individual activities are role of the reason. We want to prevent only repeating nonsense about the uncertainty of global warming and begin essentially talking seriously about the right approach to address it.” Naomi Oreskes, 2004-12-26, science historian http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A26065-2004Dec25.html