Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed
Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed – Review
Most of us are familiar with the comment, “anything’s possible.” If that’s true, then the major allegations in Red Hot Lies could certainly be possible. But surely, those who subscribe to Mr. Horner’s premises, those who think sensibly and critically, must wonder why the vast majority of climate scientists and respected technical organizations vigorously disagree. Are they, as Mr. Horner charges, “corrupt scientists who see this scare as their gravy train to federal grants and foundation money?” Or are they concerned scientists, experts in their fields who rely on data, facts, and logical principles? Without needless litany, here’s a incomplete list of Global Warming supporters: National Academy of Sciences; American Geophysical Union; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency; Australian Government, Department of Climate Change; UK Met Office; Joint Science Academies; National Climatic Data Center; National Geographic Society. And here’s a short record of naysayers: American Enterprise Institute; Ann Coulter; Cato Institute; Glenn Beck; John Birch Society; junkscience.com; Rush Limbaugh; Sean Hannity. Of those two groups, which is more likely to be correct? Seems obvious to me.