Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed
Red Hot Lies: How Global Warming Alarmists Use Threats, Fraud, and Deception to Keep You Misinformed – Review
There are two sides to every story, they say. No science is perfectly exact.But this book strongly urging paranoia about the problem of global warming is without an normal basis. Relying on randomly selected quotes from fellow travelers, employing rather anomalous data and odd figigures prevent a open study or fascinating argument. Even a polemic in this field should be based on verifiable retrospections (involving usually accepted observasions) and projections based on numerical data and analyses of core extractions, etc. as well as specifically noting temerature ranges at comparable places and samplings of CO2, correlations between pollutants etc. with health. If so accomlished, there is a clear case for great alarm and urgency for rectification. An ideological predilection, a conspiracy theory involving Nobel Prize winners, etc., caricatures, simple claims, and distortions make these diatribes an envronmental disaster in wasting the material and energy needed to house them in a volume.